Thursday, March 4, 2010

Nithyanandha....?

Today we were discussing in office about Nithyanandha and I found that everyone scolding, hating, etc, etc Nithyanandha.

There was a video showed in Sun news. Nithyanandha is having fun with an actress in that video. The actres's face has been blurred and Nithyanandha's face was very clear. If people found it wrong then both the faces should have been shown otherwise both the faces should not. So are people trying to show that only he had done mistake!? Not from that actress!?

First of all, how come some one can take video of one's pure personals? More to that they are even telecasting in the TVs. I did not say that I did not watch this video. I am just trying to say that taking video of someone's personal life is illegal. But people think that whatever Nithyanandha had done is illegal and started hitting his ashrams, etc.

Will you accept if any one takes video of your very personals when you are with your girl friend and publish it?

As per Indian law having relationship with any unmarried women is not illegal. Live-in relationships are also allowed. Even Tamil thatha has one wife and two extra fittings legally!?. People wont mind it and treat him as a very big leader..!

Even God has wives, Krishna known for his leelas, etc, etc.

Nithyanandha never said that he will not have relationship with women. He never asked you guys also the same.

Since coz I am saying these things that dosnt mean I like this guy. I just hate these god men. I don't even believe in God. I don't have belief in religious things, religions, partitions, etc.

- True guy

8 comments:

  1. Tamil thatha was "Nuch".

    I could not agree more to you regarding the "dont believe in god but what they did for nithyanandha is wrong".

    The controversial kasa-musa that i heard is: Thatha wanted money from these money-making-asiramams and they refused. This is why they are targetted.

    Sankar

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with all of sankarlal's thoughts and Sankar's comments. Tamil thatha is Tamil Kollu thathaa.. Once I even doubted, him/it as Tamil (egyptian) mummy..
    "one wife and two extra fittings legally"?!?!? Just checked his wikipedia page and now it has many data which were getting deleted earlier!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Even I had a feeling that why to peep into somebody's personal life? its their wish. Then one of my colleague responded saying if he wants to have personal life, why he came into people to preach? A swamyji or a sanyasi is a person who sacrify everything for god. Thats why people believe and worship them. Its some years belief on him. May be I can give an example like this. You studied in an engineering college for 4 years. and after that u came to know ur degree is invalid and ur college is fake.

    I dont have idea abt Tamil thatha. :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. @JP, Even in Ramayana's all sanyasis and swamis have wife. In worst case, Indhiran acted as a sanyasi(husband) and corrected one sanyasi's wife. So nowhere mentioned that swamijis should not have wife or girlfriend.

    -lal

    ReplyDelete
  5. ya Sankar, truely agree to you....people can have their personal lives and no one has any right to peep in other lives until its illegal...and i think these days our media is losing its correct path...there are many other important issues that they can show on TV and open common people eyes....it just they want to increase their TRP ratings thats why they are showing such kind of videos.

    ReplyDelete
  6. U r right!!! But, that was narrated as cheating. So, as this. Having wife is obviously its legal in any kinda society. Sacrifying doesnt mean sacrifying wife. its sacrifying your all other interests and gaining control over 5 indriyas.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Rightly said Sankar. These are just for Competition, Fame and Money. Heartless fellows!!

    Let other Swamiyar's(poli) be very alert after seeing this Scandal. This will save their life and our time. :P


    Pasathudan,
    Karthik

    ReplyDelete
  8. I do agree with u lal.. its true... its his personal and it shud actually not be telecasted.. He shud infact sue the channel.

    ReplyDelete